This supplement feels so neat and well laid-out! The rules are so easy to implement, and the idea of exploration functioning as a pointcrawl is really interesting. Bit confused though, how does healing work during downtime?
After 1 week of downtime, you heal as much HP as your class starts with. So fighters heal 5hp, experts 4hp and mages 3hp. For more healing, you'd need to extend the downtime for another week.
At least that's how I read the paragraph on page 14.
Hello, I wanted to say that I'm already translating the material into Brazilian Portuguese, but I would also like to ask if there is a character sheet available, as I can't imagine how I could put together such information on a blank sheet of paper. 😅
That's actually how Chainmail works, and it's a great procedure to plug into any OSR games. Chainmail goes even more in depth, with options like passing fire, split movements, charging, and weapon classes (from lighter and smaller to longer and heavier) that influence initiative, parry, and the number of attacks per round. You can find it in FMC's appendix also.
I ran an 8-room dungeon crawl with this last night (as its own system, no FMC) and everybody had a blast! Combat was smooth and deadly; converting 0e monsters was breezy as well. Ditching ability scores was a breath of fresh air for me and the players. We ended up supplementing the starting items table with the d100 Former Professions table from the Knave 2e draft and it added a lot to character creation. Thanks for the excellent pamphlet!
so happy to hear y’all had fun!! thank you as well for your kind words :D
i had been thinking about introducing simple backgrounds, giving a skill or maybe even +1 attack or 1 energy. maybe will add abstract backgrounds as a rule like that, though having specific backgrounds are really nice to give your characters flavor!
Specifically, the utility of Knave’s background + 3 mundane items at the roll of a d100 was a huge streamline for getting everyone up and running. As it happened, the combos of backgrounds and their thematic items ended up doubling as role playing seeds—for the brand-new-to-RPGs players in particular. And the unusual items on the list ended up being the most used/useful during play: a player used their canary to distract a pair of skeletal hounds; another player kept picking off pieces of a foraged fungus, leaving them behind as poisonous breadcrumbs; another player tangled a Minotaur in their pit-fighting net (subsequently, their character was fatally body slammed by said Minotaur, but the time that the net bought them saved another character’s life).
Of course, all of this is hugely dependent on how the game is being refereed but it worked really well for our group.
really enjoy the booklet, will be reprinting the updated edition soon. There's plenty here, but as the solo player, compelled to ask if there's a chance of you adding some tables per sit design, etc etc? Always looking for all in one. Just curious what you'd add, and its very unreasonable of me to ask. Great work and thank you for making!
someone asked me similar with regards to my bite-sized dungeon pamphlet. my feeling is that i don’t think of tables as being very useful. someone else responded to them to use chatgpt, and that sort of reflects my feelings about it—what effort spent making a table is better spent than making a specific, concrete place? i don’t know if it’s helpful to have a table of things like, “ruins”, “caves”, “tower”.
but what i think would be more interesting is using the monster table, instead, because that tells you about the inhabitants. what are werewolves doing with treants? what about hoblins with giants? what treasure are they holding onto, and why? i think those are more productive prompts that tie directly into the site and its various dimensions.
excellent answer! you know i dont tend to build my self play narratives that way (monster first, leading to narrative), tends to be the "why" first, but going to keep this mind next time i play! cheers!
At first I was very skeptical about this one, as it lost so much of what made '74 rules so special to me. No hirelings, no clerics, no level titles, shift to a point-crawl and slot-based encumbrance.
But if I look at FMC Basic as its own being, unrelated to FMC, I actually really like it. Unlike many light-rules retro clones, it actually has guidelines on dungeon stocking and wilderness! I like how every class has a unique stat, it makes hacking the game so much easier.
The rules are still rough around the corners. Some spells refer to hit dice, some spells lack duration, basic roll is easy to miss.
Otherwise, great job! Hope to see FMC Expert some day.
thank you for your kind words and feedback! i wanted to clarify some aspects, mostly that this isn’t meant to be a complete / totalizing system as much as a supplement or substitution for some aspects of OD&D.
for example, i will add explicit rules for hirelings! but the way i would treat them is just hiring them for a month and doing morale checks like for other NPCs.
another example is the ‘basic roll’, which i don’t consider to be a specific resolution procedure, as much as a point at which you would turn to randomness. i like 50-50, some people like 2-in-6, and some people might insert ability checks.
(also: neither dungeons nor the overworld are really point-crawls! i make a comparison between the wilderness proper and a point-crawl, but that’s just because i think it’s interesting to restrict movement between ‘wild hexes’ based on what paths are familiar to the travelers.)
← Return to pamphlet
Comments
Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.
This supplement feels so neat and well laid-out! The rules are so easy to implement, and the idea of exploration functioning as a pointcrawl is really interesting. Bit confused though, how does healing work during downtime?
After 1 week of downtime, you heal as much HP as your class starts with.
So fighters heal 5hp, experts 4hp and mages 3hp.
For more healing, you'd need to extend the downtime for another week.
At least that's how I read the paragraph on page 14.
Hello, I wanted to say that I'm already translating the material into Brazilian Portuguese, but I would also like to ask if there is a character sheet available, as I can't imagine how I could put together such information on a blank sheet of paper. 😅
It looks like both PDFs in this release use the booklet page layout.
Thank you, just fixed!
That's actually how Chainmail works, and it's a great procedure to plug into any OSR games. Chainmail goes even more in depth, with options like passing fire, split movements, charging, and weapon classes (from lighter and smaller to longer and heavier) that influence initiative, parry, and the number of attacks per round. You can find it in FMC's appendix also.
I ran an 8-room dungeon crawl with this last night (as its own system, no FMC) and everybody had a blast! Combat was smooth and deadly; converting 0e monsters was breezy as well. Ditching ability scores was a breath of fresh air for me and the players. We ended up supplementing the starting items table with the d100 Former Professions table from the Knave 2e draft and it added a lot to character creation. Thanks for the excellent pamphlet!
so happy to hear y’all had fun!! thank you as well for your kind words :D
i had been thinking about introducing simple backgrounds, giving a skill or maybe even +1 attack or 1 energy. maybe will add abstract backgrounds as a rule like that, though having specific backgrounds are really nice to give your characters flavor!
Specifically, the utility of Knave’s background + 3 mundane items at the roll of a d100 was a huge streamline for getting everyone up and running. As it happened, the combos of backgrounds and their thematic items ended up doubling as role playing seeds—for the brand-new-to-RPGs players in particular. And the unusual items on the list ended up being the most used/useful during play: a player used their canary to distract a pair of skeletal hounds; another player kept picking off pieces of a foraged fungus, leaving them behind as poisonous breadcrumbs; another player tangled a Minotaur in their pit-fighting net (subsequently, their character was fatally body slammed by said Minotaur, but the time that the net bought them saved another character’s life).
Of course, all of this is hugely dependent on how the game is being refereed but it worked really well for our group.
This is maybe a dumb question, but you wrote FMC, and this is your hack of that?
As I understand it, FMC is a strict OD&D clone. This is how she house rules it in her campaigns.
just about! though in a way, this is mostly for me as a player than as a referee for when my friends run off-the-cuff semi-flailsnails D&D :)
Thanks! This is more or less what I thought, but it kind of threw me for a loop. Great work :)
really enjoy the booklet, will be reprinting the updated edition soon. There's plenty here, but as the solo player, compelled to ask if there's a chance of you adding some tables per sit design, etc etc? Always looking for all in one.
Just curious what you'd add, and its very unreasonable of me to ask. Great work and thank you for making!
hey PR and thank you!!
someone asked me similar with regards to my bite-sized dungeon pamphlet. my feeling is that i don’t think of tables as being very useful. someone else responded to them to use chatgpt, and that sort of reflects my feelings about it—what effort spent making a table is better spent than making a specific, concrete place? i don’t know if it’s helpful to have a table of things like, “ruins”, “caves”, “tower”.
but what i think would be more interesting is using the monster table, instead, because that tells you about the inhabitants. what are werewolves doing with treants? what about hoblins with giants? what treasure are they holding onto, and why? i think those are more productive prompts that tie directly into the site and its various dimensions.
excellent answer! you know i dont tend to build my self play narratives that way (monster first, leading to narrative), tends to be the "why" first, but going to keep this mind next time i play! cheers!
The Rosalia quote on page 1 is wild. Love it.
Great set of rules!
thank you so much! :)
At first I was very skeptical about this one, as it lost so much of what made '74 rules so special to me. No hirelings, no clerics, no level titles, shift to a point-crawl and slot-based encumbrance.
But if I look at FMC Basic as its own being, unrelated to FMC, I actually really like it. Unlike many light-rules retro clones, it actually has guidelines on dungeon stocking and wilderness! I like how every class has a unique stat, it makes hacking the game so much easier.
The rules are still rough around the corners. Some spells refer to hit dice, some spells lack duration, basic roll is easy to miss.
Otherwise, great job! Hope to see FMC Expert some day.
thank you for your kind words and feedback! i wanted to clarify some aspects, mostly that this isn’t meant to be a complete / totalizing system as much as a supplement or substitution for some aspects of OD&D.
for example, i will add explicit rules for hirelings! but the way i would treat them is just hiring them for a month and doing morale checks like for other NPCs.
another example is the ‘basic roll’, which i don’t consider to be a specific resolution procedure, as much as a point at which you would turn to randomness. i like 50-50, some people like 2-in-6, and some people might insert ability checks.
(also: neither dungeons nor the overworld are really point-crawls! i make a comparison between the wilderness proper and a point-crawl, but that’s just because i think it’s interesting to restrict movement between ‘wild hexes’ based on what paths are familiar to the travelers.)
This.
Rocks.
thank you!!
I might be overlooking something, but what is Tempting Fate?
check the first page! flip a coin or do an equivalent
Ugh, totally missed that, CTRL+F'd for "tempt fate". Thanks!
Very nice! One question though: how you deal with Saving Throws?
thanks! :) and i explicitly removed saving throws for magical attacks, but for anything else just flip a coin or roll a die
Very nice work (again)!
I'll give it a try with my daughter and her friends, that's a level of complexity they might enjoy.
thank you!! hope they have fun with it :)
Looks good.
thank you! :)
Nossa este material ficou muito bom, eu gostaria de traduzir ele para o portugues brasileiro, poderia entrar em contato comigo via e-mail?
lucaskyyo6@gmail.com